The Democratic Republic of Congo has been a high contracting party to the OHADA treaty since 2012, in the name of supra-legality, the issue relating to the seizure of employees’ remuneration is gouverned by the uniform act on the organization of simplified procedures for the recovery of debts and means of execution which, it should be emphasized, leaves a small room for maneuver to domestic law. This is the precision on the so-called seizable portion. Readers will remember that the unseizability of employees’remuneration is a principe, which principle is accompanied by a derogation. Definition of the proportions likely to be seized on the grounds of the food character of which the remuneration of an employee dreams. It should be emphasized that, to achieve this, the plaintiff will have to meet a few conditions, in particular to provide himself with a constant enforceable title, a liquid and payable debt, obtain beforehand from the competent court a conciliation procedure without which his request can not be received... It is only in the event of failure of the said conciliation that the seizure could be authorized by the emergency judge. Hammer that certain responsibilities can be engaged in the event of obstruction in particular that of the employer and/ or the banker considered as garnishee.