[ Théorie de la subsistance de l’entreprise ]
Volume 73, Issue 2, July 2024, Pages 136–141
Ketha Unencan Jonas1
1 Département de sciences commerciales et financières, Institut supérieur de commerce de Kisangani, RD Congo
Original language: French
Copyright © 2024 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The added value of the company is distributed among the stakeholders: staff, capital providers, etc. shareholder remuneration determines the efforts of managers. The low remuneration pushes them to withdraw and the absence of entrepreneurial spirit on the part of the employees is that they do not perceive that their own performance depends on that of the company. However, the surrounding world is defined by equivalent interest. The presence of capital debt in the entity. The theory of subsistence of the company is the fact that at the beginning of the activities, the entity is in a state of insufficiency following the various debts including the equity, it will pass to the possession only after the clearance for the sharing. Correct knowledge of possession within entities. The financial state of the company would be in insufficiency at the start and then the elimination of this, making them smaller and smaller for another point of growth: ownership. And correcting employee inefficiency is justified by the slogan «it’s for them». We can be greater when we come together. The solution is group agreement. The entity is the fruit of the organization: collective cleanliness to be exploited collectively. The loss can therefore only be overcome by collective tightening and organizational solidarity and the life of the entity in the event of loss is the loan or aid, while waiting for the situation to improve and be reconstituted. Profit as a driving force. Profit goes with individualism, which goes to everyone. So, live together to produce.
Author Keywords: Subsistence, insufficiency, conservation, possession, sharing.
Volume 73, Issue 2, July 2024, Pages 136–141
Ketha Unencan Jonas1
1 Département de sciences commerciales et financières, Institut supérieur de commerce de Kisangani, RD Congo
Original language: French
Copyright © 2024 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
The added value of the company is distributed among the stakeholders: staff, capital providers, etc. shareholder remuneration determines the efforts of managers. The low remuneration pushes them to withdraw and the absence of entrepreneurial spirit on the part of the employees is that they do not perceive that their own performance depends on that of the company. However, the surrounding world is defined by equivalent interest. The presence of capital debt in the entity. The theory of subsistence of the company is the fact that at the beginning of the activities, the entity is in a state of insufficiency following the various debts including the equity, it will pass to the possession only after the clearance for the sharing. Correct knowledge of possession within entities. The financial state of the company would be in insufficiency at the start and then the elimination of this, making them smaller and smaller for another point of growth: ownership. And correcting employee inefficiency is justified by the slogan «it’s for them». We can be greater when we come together. The solution is group agreement. The entity is the fruit of the organization: collective cleanliness to be exploited collectively. The loss can therefore only be overcome by collective tightening and organizational solidarity and the life of the entity in the event of loss is the loan or aid, while waiting for the situation to improve and be reconstituted. Profit as a driving force. Profit goes with individualism, which goes to everyone. So, live together to produce.
Author Keywords: Subsistence, insufficiency, conservation, possession, sharing.
Abstract: (french)
La valeur ajoutée de l’entreprise est répartit entre les parties prenantes: le personnel, les apporteurs de capitaux... la rémunération des actionnaires conditionnent l’effort des dirigeants. La faible rémunération les pousse au retrait et l’absence d’esprit d’entreprise de la part des salariés est qu’il ne perçoit pas que leur propre performance dépend celle de l’entreprise. Or, le monde environnant se définit à l’intérêt équivalent. La présence dette capitale dans l’entité. La théorie de subsistance de l’entreprise est le fait qu’au début des activités, l’entité est en état de l’insuffisance suite aux différentes dettes y compris les fonds propres, elle passera à la possession qu’après l’apurement pour le partage. Corriger les connaissances en matière de possession au sein des entités. L’état financier de l’entreprise serait dans l’insuffisance au départ puis l’élimination de celle-ci, les rendant de plus en plus petit pour un autre point de l’accroissement: la possession. Et corriger l’inefficacité de salarié se justifie par le slogan « c’est pour eux ». On peut être plus grand quand on s’associe. La solution est l’entente du groupe. L’entité est le fruit de l’organisation: propreté collective à exploiter collectivement. La perte ne peut donc être surmonté que par le resserrement collectif et de la solidarité organisationnelle et la vie de l’entité en cas de perte sont l’emprunt ou de l’aide, en attendant que la situation s’améliore et soit reconstitué. Le profit comme moteur. Le profit va avec l’individualisme, qui va à tout le monde. Donc, vivre ensemble pour produire.
Author Keywords: Subsistance, insuffisance, conservation, possession, partage.
How to Cite this Article
Ketha Unencan Jonas, “Sustainability Theory of Business,” International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 136–141, July 2024.
