Volume 10, Issue 2, October 2014, Pages 498–506
Atif Mahmood1, Mr. Ahmad Mateen Buttar2, Irfan Ali3, and M. Arslan Saeed Khan4
1 Computer Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
2 Computer Sciences, Lecturer, CS Department University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
3 Senior Scientist, Natural Resources Division, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan
4 Computer Sciences, Punjab University Gujranwala Campus, Punjab, Pakistan
Original language: English
Copyright © 2014 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Mobile ad-hoc-network is the future network, because it can be developed easily, automatically configurable, flexible and don't depend on any network structure. It means MANET do not need already existing network infrastructure. A routing infrastructure requisite to establish in distributed controlled system. Various protocols for MANETs in routing have proposed and several evaluated work had conducted. A large amount of anticipated routing protocols and estimation made complicated to maintain the expansion and to acquire an impression of the strength and limitations of the protocols. The analyze evaluation techniques from the past and describes common problems to evaluate of routing protocols for MANETs and how to resolve them. A wide-spread MANET protocols have studied. They are categorized according their similarities and their results are deduced and eventually presented. The main goal of the work was to examine the recital of protocols, OLSR that was table driven DSR, AODV discovering average delay in packet sending and receiving, the average number of entries in the routing table: varying suspension time and different amount of nodes. An experiment was conducted to examine the recital of these protocols with OPNET 14.5 and NS2.
Author Keywords: Average packet transmission delay, throughput, end-to-end delay, OPNET, MANET, FTP.
Atif Mahmood1, Mr. Ahmad Mateen Buttar2, Irfan Ali3, and M. Arslan Saeed Khan4
1 Computer Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
2 Computer Sciences, Lecturer, CS Department University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
3 Senior Scientist, Natural Resources Division, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan
4 Computer Sciences, Punjab University Gujranwala Campus, Punjab, Pakistan
Original language: English
Copyright © 2014 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Mobile ad-hoc-network is the future network, because it can be developed easily, automatically configurable, flexible and don't depend on any network structure. It means MANET do not need already existing network infrastructure. A routing infrastructure requisite to establish in distributed controlled system. Various protocols for MANETs in routing have proposed and several evaluated work had conducted. A large amount of anticipated routing protocols and estimation made complicated to maintain the expansion and to acquire an impression of the strength and limitations of the protocols. The analyze evaluation techniques from the past and describes common problems to evaluate of routing protocols for MANETs and how to resolve them. A wide-spread MANET protocols have studied. They are categorized according their similarities and their results are deduced and eventually presented. The main goal of the work was to examine the recital of protocols, OLSR that was table driven DSR, AODV discovering average delay in packet sending and receiving, the average number of entries in the routing table: varying suspension time and different amount of nodes. An experiment was conducted to examine the recital of these protocols with OPNET 14.5 and NS2.
Author Keywords: Average packet transmission delay, throughput, end-to-end delay, OPNET, MANET, FTP.
How to Cite this Article
Atif Mahmood, Mr. Ahmad Mateen Buttar, Irfan Ali, and M. Arslan Saeed Khan, “Performance Analysis of Proactive OLSR and Reactive DSR, AODV protocols for MANET,” International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 498–506, October 2014.
